|
The
Spurned
Law
School
Applicant -
Legal
Firms
Civil
Rights
Groups
- University
Regents
My
curiosity
is getting
the best of
me, So what
went wrong
??
“Wait
List or
Denied ”
But
for many
of this
years
upcoming
freshman
class,
your
form letter
acknowledges
your greatest
fear, a
place
on the “Wait
List” or
worse “Denied”.
You have
failed in
your attempt
to become
part of the
legal profession.
For now,
as
you recover
from this
crushing
news you begin
to speculate
on your options.
And even
though
you have
already acknowledged
the fact
that
law school
admissions
is not a “One & Done” venue,
you hold
out for
hope that
you still
may receive
that acknowledgement
letter some
several
weeks
later.
But
in
review
of
your
credits
and
documents,
your
GPA
was
stellar
and
your
LSAT
score
most
respectable
in
comparison
to
others
as
posted
within
the
chart
ledger
and
notably
higher
than
your
peers
who
were
accepted.
Your
writing
sample
exemplified
your
intellectual
ability
in
putting
two
sentences
together
that
conveyed
a
clear
and
single
thought
on
the
subject
matter.
Your
penmanship
magnificent.
And
with
regards
to your
letters
of recommendation
and
community
service
support,
your
formal
interview
and
credits
would
have
enticed
any
selection
committee
member
to extend
to
you
an admissions
offer.
But
were
you
denied
access
based
on the ‘ Old
Diversity
Standard ’ or
was
your
law seat
awarded
to a
candidate
based
on a
dollar
donation
or true
Human
Bias
?
E.A.C.C.
Services
will include:
- The
details
of the
Defined
Model
(DJ 169-73-0)
(To include Representation for the Impoverished Communities)
- The
Discussion & Comments
in review of the Proposal
(including the bullet financials)
- The
Consequence
of
a ‘Straight
Top Down Selection Process Model’
- Variations
on ‘How
your
denial’ will
play
out
in
a
Court
of
Law
Fee
Base
$1300.00
Unlimited
Email
Support
(2)
Two
hours
phone
conferencing
(if
requested)
(Tele-Conferencing
available
for
Groups)
|
Data
and
information
provided
by
E.A.C.C.
will
include:
- The
details
of
the
Defined
Model
(DJ
169-73-0)
(To include Representation for the Impoverished Communities)
- The
Discussion & Comments
in
review
of
the
Proposal
(including the bullet financials)
- The
Consequence
of
a ‘Straight
Top
Down
Selection
Process
Model’
- Variations
on ‘How
your
denial’ will
play
out
in
a
Court
of
Law
|